4.7 Article

Social Cognition and the Cerebellum: A Meta-Analytic Connectivity Analysis

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 5137-5154

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23002

Keywords

social cognition; cerebellum; functional neuroimaging; meta-analysis; functional connectivity

Funding

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium [SPR15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) study explores the functional connectivity of the cerebellum with the cerebrum in social cognitive processes. In a recent meta-analysis, Van Over-walle, Baetens, Marien, and Vandekerckhove (2014) documented that the cerebellum is implicated in social processes of body reading (mirroring; e.g., understanding other persons' intentions from observing their movements) and mind reading (mentalizing, e.g., inferring other persons' beliefs, intentions or personality traits, reconstructing persons' past, future, or hypothetical events). In a recent functional connectivity study, Buckner et al. (2011) offered a novel parcellation of cerebellar topography that substantially overlaps with the cerebellar meta-analytic findings of Van Overwalle et al. (2014). This overlap suggests that the involvement of the cerebellum in social reasoning depends on its functional connectivity with the cerebrum. To test this hypothesis, we explored the meta-analytic co-activations as indices of functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the cerebrum during social cognition. The MACM results confirm substantial and distinct connectivity with respect to the functions of (a) action understanding (body reading) and (b) mentalizing (mind reading). The consistent and strong connectivity findings of this analysis suggest that cerebellar activity during social judgments reflects distinct mirroring and mentalizing functionality, and that these cerebellar functions are connected with corresponding functional networks in the cerebrum. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available