4.5 Article

Self-consistent description of the replacement current driving melt layer motion in fusion devices

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 58, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aad247

Keywords

melting; tungsten; divertor; melt layer motion; MEMOS; thermionic emission

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 [633053]
  2. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bulk replacement current density triggered by surface charge loss owing to thermionic emission leads to a volumetric Lorentz force which has been observed to drive macroscopic melt layer motion in transient tungsten melting tokamak experiments in which components of different geometries (deliberate leading edges and sloped surfaces) have been exposed to edge localized mode (ELM) pulsed heat loads in high power H-mode discharges. A self-consistent approach is formulated for the replacement current which is based on the magnetostatic limit of the resistive thermoelectric magnetohydrodynamic description of the liquid metal and results in a well-defined boundary value problem for the whole conductor. A new module is incorporated into the incompressible fluid dynamics code MEMOS-3D, which numerically solves the finite difference representation of the problem. The phenomenological approach, employed thus far to describe the replacement current, is demonstrated to be accurate for the sloped geometry but inadequate for the leading edge. MEMOS-3D simulations of very recent ASDEX-Upgrade leading edge experiments with the rigorous as well as the simplified approach are reported. For these simulations, the self-consistent approach predicts a fivefold reduction of the displaced material volume, a sevenfold reduction of the maximum peak height of displaced material and a different eroded surface morphology in comparison with the previously applied simplified approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available