4.7 Article

Immediate memory for when, where and what: Short-delay retrieval using dynamic naturalistic material

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 2495-2513

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22787

Keywords

cinematic material; scale-invariance; short-; long-delays; what-where-when tripartite pattern

Funding

  1. European Research Council (European Union) [242809]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health (Fondazione Santa Lucia)
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [242809] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the neural correlates supporting three kinds of memory judgments after very short delays using naturalistic material. In two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments, subjects watched short movie clips, and after a short retention (1.5-2.5 s), made mnemonic judgments about specific aspects of the clips. In Experiment 1, subjects were presented with two scenes and required to either choose the scene that happened earlier in the clip (scene-chronology), or with a correct spatial arrangement (scene-layout), or that had been shown (scene-recognition). To segregate activity specific to seen versus unseen stimuli, in Experiment 2 only one probe image was presented (either target or foil). Across the two experiments, we replicated three patterns underlying the three specific forms of memory judgment. The precuneus was activated during temporal-order retrieval, the superior parietal cortex was activated bilaterally for spatial-related configuration judgments, whereas the medial frontal cortex during scene recognition. Conjunction analyses with a previous study that used analogous retrieval tasks, but a much longer delay (>1 day), demonstrated that this dissociation pattern is independent of retention delay. We conclude that analogous brain regions mediate task-specific retrieval across vastly different delays, consistent with the proposal of scale-invariance in episodic memory retrieval. Hum Brain Mapp 36:2495-2513, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available