4.5 Article

Occurrence and risk assessment of organophosphorus pesticide residues in Chinese tea

Journal

HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 28-38

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1046420

Keywords

organophosphorus pesticides; tea; risk assessment; daily intake; hazard quotient

Funding

  1. earmarked fund for Innovative Research Term in Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [CAAS-ASTIP-2014-TRICAAS]
  2. Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System [NYCYTX-26]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tea is the second widely consumed beverage next to water. Tea drinking is one of the important pathways for human exposure of organonphosphorus pesticide. Consequently, incidence of organonphosphorus pesticide residues and risk assessment should be clear. In this study, the level of organonphosphorus pesticide residues in 810 Chinese teas manufactured between 2010-2013 was investigated using gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and a flame photometric detector. Incidence of organonphosphorus pesticide residues occurred with a frequency of 29% and the average concentration of 93g kg(-1). The residue levels varied from tea types, sale spots, and production area. Chlorpyrifos, isocarbophos, and triazophos were the only three organonphosphorus pesticides with detectable residues, and the detectable rates were 13.0%, 13.6%, and 17.4%, respectively. The corresponding average daily intake of chlorpyrifos, isocarbophos, and triazophos by tea drinking was 0.000083g kg(-1) bw day(-1), 0.0036g kg(-1) bw day(-1), and 0.0022g kg(-1) bw day(-1). These results showed that the total hazard quotient of organonphosphorus pesticide pesticides from tea drinking was less than 0.02 and that the tea-drinking originated organonphosphorus pesticide exposure had a little adverse health effect for human being.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available