4.6 Article

The carboxylate-releasing phosphorus-mobilizing strategy can be proxied by foliar manganese concentration in a large set of chickpea germplasm under low phosphorus supply

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 219, Issue 2, Pages 518-529

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15200

Keywords

carboxylates; Cicer arietinum; leaf manganese; malonate; pH in rhizosheath soil; phosphorus acquisition; root hair length; total root length

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT140100103]
  2. Australian Endeavour Fellowship
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council
  4. Australian Research Council [FT140100103] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Root foraging and root physiology such as exudation of carboxylates into the rhizosphere are important strategies for plant phosphorus (P) acquisition. We used 100 chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes with diverse genetic backgrounds to study the relative roles of root morphology and physiology in P acquisition. Plants were grown in pots in a low-P sterilized river sand supplied with 10 mu g P g(-1) soil as FePO4, a poorly soluble form of P. There was a large genotypic variation in root morphology (total root length, root surface area, mean root diameter, specific root length and root hair length), and root physiology (rhizosheath pH, carboxylates and acid phosphatase activity). Shoot P content was correlated with total root length, root surface area and total carboxylates per plant, particularly malonate. A positive correlation was found between mature leaf manganese (Mn) concentration and carboxylate amount in rhizosheath relative to root DW. This is the first study to demonstrate that the mature leaf Mn concentration can be used as an easily measurable proxy for the assessment of belowground carboxylate-releasing processes in a range of chickpea genotypes grown under low-P, and therefore offers an important breeding trait, with potential application in other crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available