4.6 Article

The tomato Ethylene Response Factor Sl-ERF.B3 integrates ethylene and auxin signaling via direct regulation of Sl-Aux/IAA27

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 219, Issue 2, Pages 631-640

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15165

Keywords

Aux/AA; auxin signaling; ethylene; Ethylene Response Factor (ERF); hormonal cross-talk; Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFD0400100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772372]
  3. Labex TULIP [ANR-10-LABX-41]
  4. TomGEM H2020 EU project [679796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant growth and development is coordinated by complex networks of interacting hormones, and cross-talk between ethylene and auxin signaling is essential for a wide range of plant developmental processes. Nevertheless, the molecular links underlying the interaction between the two hormones remain poorly understood. In order to decipher the cross-talk between the Ethylene Response Factor Sl-ERF.B3 and Sl-IAA27, mediating ethylene and auxin signaling, respectively, we combined reverse genetic approaches, physiological methods, transactivation experiments and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Sl-ERF.B3 is responsive to both ethylene and auxin and ectopic expression of its dominant repressor version (ERF.B3-SRDX) results in impaired sensitivity to auxin with phenotypes recalling those previously reported for Sl-IAA27 downregulated tomato lines. The expression of Sl-IAA27 is dramatically reduced in the ERF.B3-SRDX lines and Sl-ERF.B3 is shown to regulate the expression of Sl-IAA27 via direct binding to its promoter. The data support a model in which the ethylene-responsive Sl-ERF.B3 integrates ethylene and auxin signaling via regulation of the expression of the auxin signaling component Sl-IAA27. The study uncovers a molecular mechanism that links ethylene and auxin signaling in tomato.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available