4.6 Article

Energy-efficient quantum frequency estimation

Journal

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aac5b6

Keywords

quantum metrology; open quantum systems; frequency estimation; energy

Funding

  1. Royal Society under the International Exchanges Programme [IE150570]
  2. European Research Council under the StG GQCOP [637352]
  3. Foundational Questions Institute (fqxi.org) under the Physics of the Observer Programme [FQXi-RFP-1601]
  4. COST Action: 'Thermodynamics in the quantum regime' [MP1209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The problem of estimating the frequency of a two-level atom in a noisy environment is studied. Our interest is to minimise both the energetic cost of the protocol and the statistical uncertainty of the estimate. In particular, we prepare a probe in a 'GHZ-diagonal' state by means of a sequence of qubit gates applied on an ensemble of n atoms in thermal equilibrium. Noise is introduced via a phenomenological time-non-local quantum master equation, which gives rise to a phase-covariant dissipative dynamics. After an interval of free evolution, the n-atom probe is globally measured at an interrogation time chosen to minimise the error bars of the final estimate. We model explicitly a measurement scheme which becomes optimal in a suitable parameter range, and are thus able to calculate the total energetic expenditure of the protocol. Interestingly, we observe that scaling up our multipartite entangled probes offers no precision enhancement when the total available energy epsilon is limited. This is at stark contrast with standard frequency estimation, where larger probes-more sensitive but also more 'expensive' to prepare-are always preferred. Replacing epsilon by the resource that places the most stringent limitation on each specific experimental setup, would thus help to formulate more realistic metrological prescriptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available