4.6 Article

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Acromegaly: An International Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Journal

NEUROSURGERY
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 717-724

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy178

Keywords

Acromegaly; Gamma Knife; Growth hormone; Insulin-like growth factor-1; Pituitary adenoma; radiosurgery

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [U54 GM104942] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a treatment option for persistent or recurrent acromegaly secondary to a growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma, but its efficacy is inadequately defined. OBJECTIVE To assess, in a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, the outcomes of SRS for acromegaly and determine predictors. METHODS We pooled and analyzed data from 10 participating institutions of the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation for patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS with endocrine follow-up of 6 mo. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 371 patients with a mean endocrine follow-up of 79 mo. IGF-1 lowering medications were held in 56% of patients who were on pre-SRS medical therapy. The mean SRS treatment volume and margin dose were 3.0 cm(3) and 24.2 Gy, respectively. The actuarial rates of initial and durable endocrine remission at 10 yr were 69% and 59%, respectively. The mean time to durable remission after SRS was 38 mo. Biochemical relapse after initial remission occurred in 9%, with a mean time to recurrence of 17 mo. Cessation of IGF-1 lowering medication prior to SRS was the only independent predictor of durable remission (P = .01). Adverse radiation effects included the development of 1 new endocrinopathy in 26% and 1 cranial neuropathy in 4%. CONCLUSION SRS is a definitive treatment option for patients with persistent or recurrent acromegaly after surgical resection. There appears to be a statistical association between the cessation of IGF-1 lowering medications prior to SRS and durable remission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available