4.7 Review

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature characterizing auditory mismatch negativity in individuals with autism

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 106-117

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.008

Keywords

Autism; Mismatch negativity; Mismatch field; Oddball; MMN; MMF; Auditory processing; Event-related potential; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P50 DC013027]
  2. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA [SMA-0835976]
  3. Autism Speaks Foundation, Princeton, NJ [10085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of past studies have used mismatch negativity (MMN) to identify auditory processing deficits in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Our meta-analysis compared MMN responses for individuals with ASD and typically developing controls (TD). We analyzed 67 experiments across 22 publications that employed passive, auditory-based MMN paradigms with ASD and TD participants. Most studies lacked design characteristics that would lead to an accurate description of the MMN. Variability between experiments measuring MMN amplitude was smaller when limited to studies that counterbalanced stimuli. Reduced MMN amplitude was found among young children with ASD compared to controls and in experiments that used non speech sounds. Still, few studies included adolescents or those with below-average verbal IQ. Most studies suffered from small sample sizes, and aggregating these data did not reveal significant group differences. This analysis points to a need for research focused specifically on understudied ASD samples using carefully designed MMN experiments. Study of individual differences in MMN may provide further insights into distinct subgroups within the heterogeneous ASD population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available