4.7 Review

Fear extinction in the human brain: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies in healthy participants

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 16-25

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.002

Keywords

Fmri; Fear extinction; Neuroimaging; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Carlos III Health Institute (Spain) [CP10/00604, CP14/00041]
  2. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional [PI12/01306, PI12/00273, PI16/00144]
  3. KU Leuven program [PF/10/005]
  4. Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship [627743]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Clinical Career Development Award [1124472]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of fear extinction represents an important example of translational neuroscience in psychiatry and promises to improve the understanding and treatment of anxiety and fear-related disorders. We present the results of a set of meta-analyses of human fear extinction studies in healthy participants, conducted with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and reporting whole-brain results. Meta-analyses of fear extinction learning primarily implicate consistent activation of brain regions linked to threat appraisal and experience, including the dorsal anterior cingulate and anterior insular cortices. An overlapping anatomical result was obtained from the meta-analysis of extinction recall studies, except when studies directly compared an extinguished threat stimulus to an unextinguished threat stimulus (instead of a safety stimulus). In this latter instance, more consistent activation was observed in dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex regions, together with other areas including the hippocampus. While our results partially support the notion of a shared neuroanatomy between human and rodent models of extinction processes, they also encourage an expanded account of the neural basis of human fear extinction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available