4.3 Article

Inadequate Cortisol Response to the Tetracosactide (Synacthen®) Test in Non-Classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: An Exception to the Rule?

Journal

HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 262-267

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000369901

Keywords

Non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia; Tetracosactide test; Cortisol response; Adrenal insufficiency

Funding

  1. European Society of Paediatric Endocrinology Clinical Fellowship
  2. Belgian Kids' Fund for Pediatric Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To describe cortisol response to tetracosactide and to review the literature on adrenal function in non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (NCCAH) patients. Methods: We compared cortisol responses to tetracosactide (250 mu g) between NCCAH patients and a comparison group (CG) of patients with premature pubarche and normal tetracosactide test. An adequate cortisol response was defined as a peak >= 18 mu g/dl. Results: We included 35 NCCAH patients (26 girls, 9 boys), whose mean age at testing was 7.0 years (0.8-15.6), and 47 patients in the CG (39 girls, 8 boys), whose mean age was 7.2 years (0.5-9.9). Baseline cortisol was significantly higher in the NCCAH group than in the CG [12.9 (4.3-22.2) vs. 9.7 (4.2-16.2) mu g/dl, respectively; p = 0.0006]. NCCAH patients had lower cortisol peak response compared to the CG [18.2 (6.3-40) vs. 24.9 (12-30.3) mu g/dl, respectively; p < 0.0001]. Peak cortisol was <18 mu g/dl in 21/35 (60%) NCCAH patients versus 1/47 (2.1%) in the CG. No NCCAH patients had acute adrenal insufficiency, but 2 reported severe fatigue that improved with hydrocortisone. Conclusions: The cortisol response to tetracosactide was inadequate (<18 mu g/dl) in 60% of patients with NCCAH. Hydrocortisone therapy may deserve consideration when major stress (surgery, trauma, childbirth) or objectively documented fatigue occurs in NCCAH patients with inadequate cortisol response. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available