4.8 Article

Electrospun Polystyrene Fiber Diameter Influencing Bacterial Attachment, Proliferation, and Growth

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 7, Issue 14, Pages 7644-7652

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00453

Keywords

electrospinning biofilm; fiber diameter; bacteria; chronic wounds; nanofibers

Funding

  1. L. E. W. Carty Foundation
  2. Swinburne Chancellor's Research Scholarship (CRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrospun materials have been widely investigated in the past few decades as candidates for tissue engineering applications. However, there is little available data on the mechanisms of interaction of bacteria with electrospun wound dressings of different morphology and surface chemistry. This knowledge could allow the development of effective devices against bacterial infections in chronic wounds. In this paper, the interactions of three bacterial species (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus) with electrospun polystyrene meshes were investigated. Bacterial response to meshes with different fiber diameters was assessed through a combination of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy. Experiments included attachment studies in liquid medium but also directly onto agar plates; the latter was aimed at mimicking a chronic wound environment. Fiber diameter was shown to affect the ability of bacteria to proliferate within the fibrous networks, depending on cell size and shape. The highest proliferation rates occurred when fiber diameter was close to the bacterial size. Nanofibers were found to induce conformational changes of rod shaped bacteria, limiting the colonization process and inducing cell death. The data suggest that simply tuning the morphological properties of electrospun fibers may be one strategy used to control biofilm formation within wound dressings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available