4.4 Article

Cardiovascular Health Status Among Caribbean Hispanics Living in Northern Manhattan and Ecuadorian Natives/Mestizos in Rural Coastal Ecuador: A Comparative Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 634-641

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9658-0

Keywords

Cardiovascular health; Arterial hypertension; Diabetes mellitus; Atahualpa; Northern Manhattan

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS029993, R37 NS 29993, R37 NS029993] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of cardiovascular health (CVH) status of a given population is mandatory to reduce the burden of vascular diseases in the region. We compared CVH of two distinct populations having similar ethnic backgrounds to understand the role of lifestyle and environment on their CVH, and to provide insights in the planning of cost-effective health strategies. CVH status was compared in two Hispanic populations living in Northern Manhattan and Atahualpa (rural coastal Ecuador) using the health metrics proposed by the American Heart Association. Both studies used similar definitions of CVH and similar inclusion criteria for participating subjects (age a parts per thousand yen40 years, cardiovascular disease-free status, and living at their respective localities for a parts per thousand yen3 months). The studied populations consisted of 1,617 Caribbean Hispanics living in Northern Manhattan (mean age 66 +/- A 9 years), and 616 Atahualpa residents (mean age 59 +/- A 13 years). Atahualpa residents had significantly better metrics than Caribbean Hispanics, with the exception of fasting glucose levels. Likewise, the odds for having 5-7 ideal metrics were also better in Atahualpa residents, irrespective of age. CVH is better in Atahualpa residents than in Caribbean Hispanics living in Northern Manhattan. These differences are likely related to a healthier lifestyle in a rural setting and provide insights for setting cardiovascular prevention priorities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available