4.7 Article

Recurrent spontaneous vertigo with interictal headshaking nystagmus

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 24, Pages E2135-E2145

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005689

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2016R1D1A1B04935568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To define a disorder characterized by recurrent spontaneous vertigo (RSV) of unknown etiology and interictal headshaking nystagmus (HSN). Methods We characterized HSN in 35 patients with RSV-HSN compared to that recorded in randomly selected patients with compensated vestibular neuritis (VN), vestibular migraine (VM), and Meniere disease (MD). Results The estimated time constant (TC) of the primary phase of HSN was 12 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-13) in patients with RSV-HSN, which was larger than those in patients with VN (5 seconds, 95% CI 4-5), VM(5 seconds, 95% CI 5-6), or MD(6 seconds, 95% CI 5-6). TCs of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex were also larger during the rotatory chair test in patients with RSV-HSN. Among the 35 patients with RSV-HSN, 7 showed vigorous long-lasting HSN with a peak slow-phase velocity >50.0 degrees/s. In 5 patients (5 of 7, 71%) with vigorous HSN, HSN could have been induced even with headshaking for only 2 to 5 seconds. Long-term prognosis was favorable, with a resolution or improvement of the symptoms in more than half of the patients during the median follow-up of 12 (range 2-58) years from symptom onset. None developed VM, MD, or cerebellar dysfunction during the follow-up. Conclusion The clinical features and characteristics of HSN in our patients indicate a hyperactive and asymmetric velocity-storage mechanism that gives rise to intermittent attacks of spontaneous vertigo probably when marginal compensation of underlying pathology is disrupted by endogenous or exogenous factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available