4.7 Article

Considerations for development of therapies for cutaneous neurofibroma

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages S21-S30

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005791

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
  2. Neurofibromatosis Therapeutic Acceleration Program (NTAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The only therapies currently available for cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are procedural. The goals of the Therapies Development Working Group were to (1) summarize currently available treatment options for cNF, (2) define key considerations for drug discovery and development generally, and specifically for cNF, and (3) outline recommendations for the successful development of medical therapies for cNF. Methods The subgroup reviewed published and unpublished data on procedural, drug/device, and medical treatment approaches utilized for cNFs via literature search. The team defined diseaseand patient-specific factors to consider for therapies development in a series of consensus meetings. Results The team identified 5 approaches entailing procedural and drug/device methods currently under study. There have been 4 clinical studies exploring various interventional therapies, from which outcomes were highly variable. The team identified 4 key factors to prioritize during the development of products for the treatment for cNF: safety, anatomic distribution of cNF, numbers of tumors to be treated, and route of administration. Conclusions The number, size, and distribution of cNF is highly variable among patients with NF1 and it is possible that different phenotypes will require different drug development paths. The nonfatal nature of the disease and relatively limited patient numbers suggest that for any product to have a higher likelihood of acceptance, it will have to (1) demonstrate an effect that is clinically meaningful, (2) have a safety profile conducive to long-term dosing, and (3) have a low manufacturing cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available