4.7 Article

Distinct neural circuits support incentivized inhibition

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 435-444

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.055

Keywords

Reward; Response; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; Anterior insula; Nucleus accumbens; Human; MIDI task

Funding

  1. Stanford Neuroscience Institute NeuroChoice Initiative grant
  2. National Institute of Mental Health Predoctoral Training Program [T32-MH020006]
  3. NeuroChoice Initiative postdoctoral fellowship
  4. National Institute on Aging [F32-AG039131, K99-AG0425696, R00-AG042596]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability to inhibit responses under high stakes, or incentivized inhibition, is critical for adaptive impulse control. While previous research indicates that right ventrolateral prefrontal cortical (VLPFC) activity plays a key role in response inhibition, less research has addressed how incentives might influence this circuit. By combining a novel behavioral task, functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), we targeted and characterized specific neural circuits that support incentivized inhibition. Behaviorally, large incentives enhanced responses to obtain money, but also reduced response inhibition. Functionally, activity in both right VLPFC and right anterior insula (AIns) predicted successful inhibition for high incentives. Structurally, characterization of a novel white-matter tract connecting the right AIns and VLPFC revealed an association of tract coherence with incentivized inhibition performance. Finally, individual differences in right VLPFC activity statistically mediated the association of right AIns-VLPFC tract coherence with incentivized inhibition performance. These multimodal findings bridge brain structure, brain function, and behavior to clarify how individuals can inhibit impulses, even in the face of high stakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available