4.6 Article

Retinal vessel segmentation of color fundus images using multiscale convolutional neural network with an improved cross-entropy loss function

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 309, Issue -, Pages 179-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.011

Keywords

Retinal vessel segmentation; Convolutional neural network; Multiscale; Cross-entropy loss function; Conditional random field

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771415]
  2. Cernet Innovation Project [NGII20170702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinal vessel analysis of fundus images is an indispensable method for the screening and diagnosis of related diseases. In this paper, we propose a novel retinal vessel segmentation method of the fundus images based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and fully connected conditional random fields (CRFs). The segmentation process is mainly divided into two steps. Firstly, a multiscale CNN architecture with an improved cross-entropy loss function is proposed to produce the probability map from image to image. We construct the multiscale network by combining the feature map of each middle layer to learn more detail information of the retinal vessels. Meanwhile, our proposed cross-entropy loss function ignores the slightest loss of relatively easy samples in order to take more attention to learn the hard examples. Secondly, CRFs is applied to get the final binary segmentation result which makes use of more spatial context information by taking into account the interactions among all of the pixels in the fundus images. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been evaluated on two public datasets, i.g., DRIVE and STARE with comparisons against eleven state-of-the-art approaches including five deep learning based methods. Results show that our method allows for detection of more tiny blood vessels and more precise locating of the edges. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available