4.6 Article

The Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Polymorphism Moderates an Effect of Physical Activity on Working Memory Performance

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1770-1779

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0956797613480367

Keywords

BDNF; physical activity; working memory; executive function; genetics; visual memory; episodic memory

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL065137, P01 HL040962] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG024827, P50 AG005133] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK095172] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM081760, T32GM081760] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [P30 MH090333] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical activity enhances cognitive performance, yet individual variability in its effectiveness limits its widespread therapeutic application. Genetic differences might be one source of this variation. For example, carriers of the methionine-specifying (Met) allele of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism have reduced secretion of BDNF and poorer memory, yet physical activity increases BDNF levels. To determine whether the BDNF polymorphism moderated an association of physical activity with cognitive functioning among 1,032 midlife volunteers (mean age = 44.59 years), we evaluated participants' performance on a battery of tests assessing memory, learning, and executive processes, and evaluated their physical activity with the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. BDNF genotype interacted robustly with physical activity to affect working memory, but not other areas of cognitive functioning. In particular, greater levels of physical activity offset a deleterious effect of the Met allele on working memory performance. These findings suggest that physical activity can modulate domain-specific genetic (BDNF) effects on cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available