4.6 Review

Sclerostin in chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder think first before you block it!

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 408-414

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy129

Keywords

bone metabolism; calcification; cardiovascular complication; chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder; vascular calcification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Canonical Wnt signalling activity is a major player in physiological and adaptive bone metabolism. Wnt signalling is regulated by soluble inhibitors, with sclerostin being the most widely studied. Sclerostin's main origin is the osteocyte and its major function is blockade of osteoblast differentiation and function. Therefore, sclerostin is a potent inhibitor of bone formation and mineralization. Consequently, blocking sclerostin via human monoclonal antibodies (such as romosozumab) represents a promising perspective for the treatment of (postmenopausal) osteoporosis. However, sclerostin's physiology and the effects of sclerostin monoclonal antibody treatment are not limited to the skeleton. Specifically, the potential roles of sclerostin in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated pathologies covered by the term chronic kidney disease and mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD), which also includes accelerated cardiovascular calcification, warrant specific attention. CKD-MBD is a complex disease condition in which sclerostin antibodies may interfere at different levels and influence the multiform interplay of hyperparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy and vascular calcification, but the clinical sequelae remain obscure. The present review summarizes the potential effects of sclerostin blockade in CKD-MBD. We will address and summarize the urgent research targets that are being identified and that need to be addressed before a valid risk-benefit ratio can be established in the clinical setting of CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available