4.6 Article

Molecular characterization of epithelioid haemangioendotheliomas identifies novel WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion variants

Journal

HISTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 699-708

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/his.12697

Keywords

CAMTA1; epithelioid; haemangioendothelioma; sarcoma; TFE3; translocation; WWTR1; YAP1

Funding

  1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsEpithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a malignant vascular neoplasm. Subsets have been characterized previously by translocations resulting in either WWTR1-CAMTA1 or YAP1-TFE3 fusion. We sought to develop molecular and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays to aid in the diagnosis and characterization of EHE. Methods and resultsFifty-two formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cases diagnosed between 2002 and 2014 were retrieved from the pathology files of our institutions. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays were optimized to detect WWTR1-CAMTA1 and YAP1-TFE3 fusion transcripts in FFPE tissue and transcription factor E3 (TFE3) protein accumulation was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RNA was extracted from 33 adequate samples, with more recent cases providing a greater yield of high quality RNA. Fourteen of 18 informative cases were positive for WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion transcripts, four of which showed higher-grade cytological features termed by some as malignant EHE'. Novel in-frame fusion transcripts were identified in four cases by direct sequencing. IHC revealed variable nuclear TFE3 staining in six of 17 cases; three with patchy staining showed WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion. One of 18 informative cases was positive for YAP1-TFE3 fusion and showed strong nuclear TFE3 staining by IHC. ConclusionsThis study confirms the high incidence of WWTR1-CAMTA1 and YAP1-TFE3 rearrangements in EHE and indicates that the staining pattern for TFE3 IHC is critical for specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available