4.2 Article

Assessment of mercury contamination in Brycon falcatus (Characiformes: Bryconidae) and human health risk by consumption of this fish from the Teles Pires River, Southern Amazonia

Journal

NEOTROPICAL ICHTHYOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA ICTIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20160106

Keywords

Condition factor; Hepatosomatic index; Matrinxa; Tapajos basin; Weight-length relationship

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT) [005/2012]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq Universal, MCTI/CNPq) [14/2014]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brycon falcatus is one of the most highly consumed species of fish within the region in the Teles Pires basin, and has great commercial importance in sport and professional artisanal fishing. The objective of this study was to analyze the presence and concentration of total mercury (THg) in the muscle, liver and gills of B. falcatus, and calculate the risk to human health of THg contamination from ingestion of the fish. THg concentrations were similar in the liver (0.076 mg kg(-1)) and muscle (0.052 mg kg(-1)), and higher than in the gills (0.009 mg kg(-1)). The levels of HgT present in B. falcatus tissues did not influence weight gain and nutritional status. Based on the condition factor, weight and length ratio and hepatosomatic index, it seems that the concentrations of THg did not influence the health and well-being of B. falcatus collected in the Teles Pires River basin. THg concentrations in the muscle of B. falcatus are below the limit recommended by the World Health Organization for people who consume until 250 g of fish per week. The risk of deleterious effects on human health may exist if there is a greater consumption of B. falcatus such as 340 g/day, that is the mean of fish consumption by indigenous and riverine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available