4.3 Article

How Should We Define Postnatal Growth Restriction in Preterm Infants?

Journal

NEONATOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 177-180

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000489388

Keywords

Growth and development; Infant; Premature; Neurodevelopment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Postnatal growth restriction is very common among preterm infants. Growth restriction might be associated with neurodevelopment impairment. The definition of postnatal growth restriction varies among studies. It has often been based on statistical parameters, but we lack biological data to support this definition. Objectives: The aim here was to study the association between neurodevelopment and postnatal growth restriction defined applying 2 different strategies. Methods: Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II was performed at 2 years corrected age in 168 preterm infants. Postnatal growth restriction was defined as a weight z-score at 36 weeks <-1.5 or treated as a continuous variable (fall in weight z-scores from birth to 36 weeks postmenstrual age). Results: Weight z-scores fell in almost all patients (98.8%), and 44.1% had z-scores <-1.5 at 36 weeks. After adjusting for gestational age and small for gestational age at birth, every 1-point fall in weight z-score was associated with a 5.6 point (95% CI 1.7 to 9.4) decrease in the Mental Developmental Index. A weight z-score <-1.5 at 36 weeks was not associated with a worse mental or psychomotor result. Conclusion: A fall in the weight z-score from birth to 36 weeks is a more rational definition of postnatal growth restriction, and it could predict neurodevelopment. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available