4.6 Review

Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we making headway?

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 273-291

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.28

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sheikh Khalifa Al Nahyan Ben Zayed Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy
  2. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1 TR000371]
  3. MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is one of the most frequently dysregulated pathways in cancer and, consequently, more than 40 compounds that target key components of this signalling network have been tested in clinical trials involving patients with a range of different cancers. The clinical development of many of these agents, however, has not advanced to late-phase randomized trials, and the antitumour activity of those that have been evaluated in comparative prospective studies has typically been limited, or toxicities were found to be prohibitive. Nevertheless, the mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus and the PI3K inhibitors idelalisib and copanlisib have been approved by the FDA for clinical use in the treatment of a number of different cancers. Novel compounds with greater potency and selectivity, as well as improved therapeutic indices owing to reduced risks of toxicity, are clearly required. In addition, biomarkers that are predictive of a response, such as PIK3CA mutations for inhibitors of the PI3K catalytic subunit a isoform, must be identified and analytically and clinically validated. Finally, considering that oncogenic activation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway often occurs alongside pro-tumorigenic aberrations in other signalling networks, rational combinations are also needed to optimize the effectiveness of treatment. Herein, we review the current experience with anticancer therapies that target the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available