4.6 Review

Therapeutic approaches for cardiac regeneration and repair

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 585-600

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41569-018-0036-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AR-067294, HL-130253, HD-087351, HL-138426]
  2. Fondation Leducq Transatlantic Networks of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research
  3. Robert A. Welch Foundation [1-0025]
  4. Uehara Memorial Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship
  5. Kanae Foreign Study Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ischaemic heart disease is a leading cause of death worldwide. Injury to the heart is followed by loss of the damaged cardiomyocytes, which are replaced with fibrotic scar tissue. Depletion of cardiomyocytes results in decreased cardiac contraction, which leads to pathological cardiac dilatation, additional cardiomyocyte loss, and mechanical dysfunction, culminating in heart failure. This sequential reaction is defined as cardiac remodelling. Many therapies have focused on preventing the progressive process of cardiac remodelling to heart failure. However, after patients have developed end-stage heart failure, intervention is limited to heart transplantation. One of the main reasons for the dramatic injurious effect of cardiomyocyte loss is that the adult human heart has minimal regenerative capacity. In the past 2 decades, several strategies to repair the injured heart and improve heart function have been pursued, including cellular and noncellular therapies. In this Review, we discuss current therapeutic approaches for cardiac repair and regeneration, describing outcomes, limitations, and future prospects of preclinical and clinical trials of heart regeneration. Substantial progress has been made towards understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating heart regeneration, offering the potential to control cardiac remodelling and redirect the adult heart to a regenerative state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available