4.7 Article

Quantifying solid stress and elastic energy from excised or in situ tumors

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 1091-1105

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2018.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01-CA080124, R35-CA197743, R01-CA208205, F32-CA216944-01]
  2. Susan G. Komen Foundation [PDF14201739]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [F31HL126449]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid stress, distinct from both tissue stiffness and fluid pressure, is a mechanical stress that is often elevated in both murine and human tumors. The importance of solid stress in tumor biology has been recognized in initial studies: solid stress promotes tumor progression and lowers the efficacy of anticancer therapies by compressing blood vessels and contributing to hypoxia. However, robust, reproducible, and objective methods that go beyond demonstration and bulk measurements have not yet been established. We have developed three new techniques to rigorously measure and map solid stress in both human and murine tumors that are able to account for heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment. We describe here these methods and their independent advantages: 2D spatial mapping of solid stress (planar-cut method), sensitive estimation of solid stress in small tumors (slicing method), and in situ solid-stress quantification (needle-biopsy method). Furthermore, the preservation of tissue morphology and structure allows for subsequent histological analyses in matched tumor sections, facilitating quantitative correlations between solid stress and markers of interest. The three procedures each require similar to 2 h of experimental time per tumor. The required skill sets include basic experience in tumor resection and/or biopsy (in mice or humans), as well as in intravital imaging (e.g., ultrasonography).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available