4.7 Article

N6-methyladenosine RNA modification regulates embryonic neural stem cell self-renewal through histone modifications

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 195-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-017-0057-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CIHR Operating grant [115194]
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant [327612]
  3. NCI [CA159859]
  4. CIRM (California Institute for Regenerative Medicine) Leadership Award [LA1-01747]
  5. NIGMS grant [GM062848]
  6. NIH R01 awards [MH109978, HG008155]
  7. NIH RF1 award [AG054012]
  8. NIH U01 award [HG007610]
  9. CIRM Training Grant [TG2-01162]
  10. NIH R01 award [R01 GM110090]
  11. SBP Cancer Center Pilot grant [5P30 CA030199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Internal N-6-methyladenosine (m(6)A) modification is widespread in messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and is catalyzed by heterodimers of methyltransferase-like protein 3 (Mettl3) and Mettl14. To understand the role of m(6)A in development, we deleted Mettl14 in embryonic neural stem cells (NSCs) in a mouse model. Phenotypically, NSCs lacking Mett114 displayed markedly decreased proliferation and premature differentiation, suggesting that m(6)A modification enhances NSC self-renewal. Decreases in the NSC pool led to a decreased number of late-born neurons during cortical neurogenesis. Mechanistically, we discovered a genome-wide increase in specific histone modifications in Mett114 knockout versus control NSCs. These changes correlated with altered gene expression and observed cellular phenotypes, suggesting functional significance of altered histone modifications in knockout cells. Finally, we found that m(6)A regulates histone modification in part by destabilizing transcripts that encode histone-modifying enzymes. Our results suggest an essential role for m(6)A in development and reveal m(6)A-regulated histone modifications as a previously unknown mechanism of gene regulation in mammalian cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available