4.8 Article

Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 1277-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0096-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VIB TechWatch Grant
  2. Foundation Against Cancer grants [2016-070]
  3. ERC Consolidator Grants [724226_cis-CONTROL]
  4. Funds for Research - Flanders [1701018N, G065615N]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [J3730-B26]
  6. KU Leuven grants (SymBioSys) [PFV/10/016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer cells are embedded in the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex ecosystem of stromal cells. Here, we present a 52,698-cell catalog of the TME transcriptome in human lung tumors at single-cell resolution, validated in independent samples where 40,250 additional cells were sequenced. By comparing with matching non-malignant lung samples, we reveal a highly complex TME that profoundly molds stromal cells. We identify 52 stromal cell subtypes, including novel subpopulations in cell types hitherto considered to be homogeneous, as well as transcription factors underlying their heterogeneity. For instance, we discover fibroblasts expressing different collagen sets, endothelial cells downregulating immune cell homing and genes coregulated with established immune checkpoint transcripts and correlating with T-cell activity. By assessing marker genes for these cell subtypes in bulk RNA-sequencing data from 1,572 patients, we illustrate how these correlate with survival, while immuno-histochemistry for selected markers validates them as separate cellular entities in an independent series of lung tumors. Hence, in providing a comprehensive catalog of stromal cells types and by characterizing their phenotype and co-optive behavior, this resource provides deeper insights into lung cancer biology that will be helpful in advancing lung cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available