4.8 Article

Efficient cooling of rocky planets by intrusive magmatism

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 322-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0094-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ETH Zurich grant [ETH-4612-1]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/ERC) [320639]
  3. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [642029-ITN CREEP, 674899 SUBITOP]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Earth is in a plate tectonics regime with high surface heat flow concentrated at constructive plate boundaries. Other terrestrial bodies that lack plate tectonics are thought to lose their internal heat by conduction through their lids and volcanism: hotter planets (Io and Venus) show widespread volcanism whereas colder ones (modern Mars and Mercury) are less volcanically active. However, studies of terrestrial magmatic processes show that less than 20% of melt volcanically erupts, with most melt intruding into the crust. Signatures of large magmatic intrusions are also found on other planets. Yet, the influence of intrusive magmatism on planetary cooling remains unclear. Here we use numerical magmatic-thermo-mechanical models to simulate global mantle convection in a planetary interior. In our simulations, warm intrusive magmatism acts to thin the lithosphere, leading to sustained recycling of overlying crustal material and cooling of the mantle. In contrast, volcanic eruptions lead to a thick lithosphere that insulates the upper mantle and prevents efficient cooling. We find that heat loss due to intrusive magmatism can be particularly efficient compared to volcanic eruptions if the partitioning of heat-producing radioactive elements into the melt phase is weak. We conclude that the mode of magmatism experienced by rocky bodies determines the thermal and compositional evolution of their interior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available