4.8 Article

Multiplex assessment of protein variant abundance by massively parallel sequencing

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages 874-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0122-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Association for Cancer Research
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [1R01GM109110, 5R24GM115277, P50GM115279]
  3. National Cancer Institute [R01CA096670, P30CA21765]
  4. NIH Director's Pioneer Award [DP1HG007811]
  5. National Cancer Institute Interdisciplinary Training Grant in Cancer [2T32CA080416]
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  7. National Institute of General Medical Sciences Training Grant [T32GM007454]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining the pathogenicity of genetic variants is a critical challenge, and functional assessment is often the only option. Experimentally characterizing millions of possible missense variants in thousands of clinically important genes requires generalizable, scalable assays. We describe variant abundance by massively parallel sequencing (VAMP-seq), which measures the effects of thousands of missense variants of a protein on intracellular abundance simultaneously. We apply VAMP-seq to quantify the abundance of 7,801 single-amino-acid variants of PTEN and TPMT, proteins in which functional variants are clinically actionable. We identify 1,138 PTEN and 777 TPMT variants that result in low protein abundance, and may be pathogenic or alter drug metabolism, respectively. We observe selection for low-abundance PTEN variants in cancer, and show that p.Pro38Ser, which accounts for similar to 10% of PTEN missense variants in melanoma, functions via a dominant-negative mechanism. Finally, we demonstrate that VAMP-seq is applicable to other genes, highlighting its generalizability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available