4.8 Article

Regulation of cell cycle progression by cell-cell and cell-matrix forces

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0107-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness/FEDER [BES-2013-062633, BFU2016-79916-P, BFU2014-52586-REDT, BFU2015-65074-P, BFU2016-75101-P, RYC-2014-15559]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014-SGR-927]
  3. European Research Council [CoG-616480]
  4. European Commission [SEP-210342844]
  5. Obra Social La Caixa, a Career Integration Grant within the seventh European Community Framework Programme [PCIG10-GA-2011-303848]
  6. Fundacio la Marato de TV3 [20133330]
  7. MINECO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has long been proposed that the cell cycle is regulated by physical forces at the cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interfaces(1-12). However, the evolution of these forces during the cycle has never been measured in a tissue, and whether this evolution affects cell cycle progression is unknown. Here, we quantified cell-cell tension and cell-ECM traction throughout the complete cycle of a large cell population in a growing epithelium. These measurements unveil temporal mechanical patterns that span the entire cell cycle and regulate its duration, the G1-S transition and mitotic rounding. Cells subjected to higher intercellular tension exhibit a higher probability to transition from G1 to S, as well as shorter G1 and S-G2-M phases. Moreover, we show that tension and mechanical energy are better predictors of the duration of G1 than measured geometric properties. Tension increases during the cell cycle but decreases 3 hours before mitosis. Using optogenetic control of contractility, we show that this tension drop favours mitotic rounding. Our results establish that cell cycle progression is regulated cooperatively by forces between the dividing cell and its neighbours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available