4.8 Article

Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes restore function in infarcted hearts of non-human primates

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 597-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4162

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01HL128362, R01 HL084642, P01HL094374]
  2. Fondation Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence
  3. UW Medicine Heart Regeneration Program
  4. Washington Research Foundation
  5. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute's Production Assistance for Cell Therapies (PACT)
  6. Cell Analysis Facility Flow Cytometry and Imaging Core in the Department of Immunology at the University of Washington

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte grafts can remuscularize substantial amounts of infarcted myocardium and beat in synchrony with the heart, but in some settings cause ventricular arrhythmias. It is unknown whether human cardiomyocytes can restore cardiac function in a physiologically relevant large animal model. Here we show that transplantation of similar to 750 million cryopreserved human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) enhances cardiac function in macaque monkeys with large myocardial infarctions. One month after hESC-CM transplantation, global left ventricular ejection fraction improved 10.6 +/- 0.9% vs. 2.5 +/- 0.8% in controls, and by 3 months there was an additional 12.4% improvement in treated vs. a 3.5% decline in controls. Grafts averaged 11.6% of infarct size, formed electromechanical junctions with the host heart, and by 3 months contained similar to 99% ventricular myocytes. A subset of animals experienced graft-associated ventricular arrhythmias, shown by electrical mapping to originate from a point-source acting as an ectopic pacemaker. Our data demonstrate that remuscularization of the infarcted macaque heart with human myocardium provides durable improvement in left ventricular function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available