4.6 Article

Optimization of ScSZ/GDC bilayer thin film electrolyte for anodic aluminum oxide supported low temperature solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 34, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aac132

Keywords

low temperature solid oxide fuel cells; scandia stabilized zirconia; gadolinia doped ceria; bilayer; anodized aluminum oxide

Funding

  1. Global Frontier R&D Program on Center for Multiscale Energy System - National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea [2012M3A6A7054855]
  2. Creative Materials Discovery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2017M3D1A1040688]
  3. JSPS (Kyoto University) [2017K2A9A2A08000197]
  4. NRF (Seoul National University) [2017K2A9A2A08000197]
  5. Seoul Urban Data Science Lab Project through the Seoul Digital Foundation - Seoul Metropolitan Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the poor chemical stability of CeO2-based materials, doped CeO2 electrolytes are generally used as a stabilized ZrO2 protection layer/doped CeO2 electrolyte bilayer structure. Since the ionic conductivity of stabilized ZrO2 materials is lower than that of doped CeO2 materials, the thickness of the ZrO2 protective layer needs to be optimized. Thus, in this study, nano-porous anodic aluminum oxide template based scandia stabilized zirconia (ScSZ)/gadolinia doped ceria (GDC) bilayer electrolyte low temperature solid oxide fuel cells (LT-SOFCs) are successfully fabricated and investigated. The optimized thickness of the ScSZ protection layer is revealed by physical and electrochemical characterizations to maximize the performance of LT-SOFCs. The 160 nm ScSZ/400 nm GDC bilayer electrolyte LT-SOFC achieves a maximum power density of 252mW . cm(-2) and an open circuit voltage of 1.02 V OCV at 450 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available