4.8 Article

Ultrasmall Au nanocatalysts supported on nitrided carbon for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction: the role of the carbon support in high selectivity

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 10, Issue 30, Pages 14678-14686

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr04322a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (CBET) [1705566]
  2. Green Emulsions Micelles and Surfactants (GEMS) Center
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Canada Research Chairs program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Au is one of the most promising electrocatalysts to convert CO2 into CO in an aqueous-phase electrochemical reduction. However, ultrasmall Au nanocatalysts (AuNCs, <2 nm) have proven to be favorable for water reduction over CO2, although they possess a large surface-to-volume ratio and potentially are ideal for CO2 reduction. We herein report that ultrasmall AuNCs (1.9 +/- 0.3 nm) supported on nitrided carbon are remarkably active and selective for CO2 reduction. The mass activity for CO of AuNCs reaches 967 A g(-1) with a faradaic efficiency for CO of approximate to 83% at -0.73 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode) that is an order of magnitude more active than the state-of-the-art results. The high activity is endowed by the large surface area per unit weight and the high selectivity of ultrasmall AuNCs for CO2 reduction originates from the cooperative effect of Au and the nitrided carbon support where the surface N sites act as Lewis bases to increase the surface charge density of AuNCs and enhance the localized concentration of CO2 nearby catalytically active Au sites. We show that our results can be applied to other pre-synthesized Au catalysts to largely improve their selectivity for CO2 reduction by 50%. Our method is expected to illustrate a general guideline to effectively lower the cost of Au catalysts per unit weight of the product while maintaining its high selectivity for CO2 reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available