4.8 Article

All Inkjet-Printed Amperometric Multiplexed Biosensors Based on Nanostructured Conductive Hydrogel Electrodes

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 3322-3327

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00003

Keywords

inkjet printing; multiplex; biosensor; polyaniline; hydrogel

Funding

  1. Chinese National Key Fundamental Research Project [2017YFA0206302]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61674078, 61229401, 41401257, 1157436]
  3. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20130055]
  4. PAPD program
  5. Sloan Research Fellowship
  6. Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiplexing, one of the main trends in biosensors, aims to detect several analytes simultaneously by integrating miniature sensors on a chip. However, precisely depositing electrode materials and selective enzymes on distinct microelectrode arrays remains an obstacle to massively produced multiplexed sensors. Here, we report on a drop-on-demand inkjet printing process to fabricate multiplexed biosensors based on nanostructured conductive hydrogels in which the electrode material and several kinds of enzymes were printed on the electrode arrays one by one by employing a multinozzle inkjet system. The whole inkjet printing process can be finished within three rounds of printing and only one round of alignment. For a page of sensor arrays containing 96 working electrodes, the printing process took merely similar to 5 min. The multiplexed assays can detect glucose, lactate, and triglycerides in real time with good selectivity and high sensitivity, and the results in phosphate buffer solutions and calibration serum samples are comparable. The inkjet printing process exhibited advantages of high efficiency and accuracy, which opens substantial possibilities for massive fabrication of integrated multiplexed biosensors for human health monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available