3.8 Review

lSaphenous vein graft vs. radial artery graft searching for the best second coronary artery bypass graft

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SAUDI HEART ASSOCIATION
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 247-254

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2013.06.001

Keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); Arterial grafts; Saphenous vein vs. radial artery; Radial artery graft patency; Radial artery graft spasm; RA graft long-term outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was first used in the late 1960s. This revolutionary procedure created hope among ischemic heart disease patients. Multiple conduits are used and the golden standard is the left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery. Although all approaches were advocated by doctors, the use of saphenous vein grafts became the leading approach used by the majority of cardiac surgeons in the 1970s. The radial artery graft was introduced at the same time but was not as prevalent due to complications. It was reintroduced into clinical practice in 1989. The procedure was not well received initially but it has since shown superiority in patency as well as long-term survival after CABG. This review provides a summary of characteristics, technical features and patency rates of the radial artery graft in comparison with venous conduits. Current studies and research into radial artery grafts and saphenous vein grafts for CABG are explored. However, more studies are required to verify the various findings of the positive effects of coronary artery bypass grafting with the help of radial arteries on mortality and long-lasting patency. (C) 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available