4.5 Article

Conservation With a Human Face? Comparing Local Participation and Benefit Sharing From a National Park and a State Forest Plantation in Tanzania

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2158244013512665

Keywords

benefit sharing; conservation; local communities; participation; Tanzania

Funding

  1. EKOSIASA project - Norwegian Programme for Development, Research and Education (NUFU)
  2. PAPIA project (Protected Areas and Poverty in Africa) - Research Council of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Participatory approaches to natural resources management have evolved as a way to secure local people's support for environmental conservation. This study compares participatory approaches used by a national park and a state forest plantation in Tanzania. It shows how in similar settings, various parts of the State pursue various policies that affect communities in different ways. The extent of participation and amount of benefits accrued are found to have a paramount role in determining local people's attitude to conservation. Local communities do not generally regard the national park as being beneficial, while the forest plantation is regarded as an important means for their survival. The failure of the park to allow meaningful local participation and equitable sharing of the park's benefits with affected local people, is leading to hatred, resentment, and illegal harvest of natural resources from the park.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available