4.6 Article

Intestinal epithelial Toll-like receptor 4 prevents metabolic syndrome by regulating interactions between microbes and intestinal epithelial cells in mice

Journal

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 727-740

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2017.114

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM078238, R01DK083752]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome, although Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been implicated. We investigated whether TLR4 in the intestinal epithelium regulates metabolic syndrome by coordinating interactions between the luminal microbiota and host genes that regulate metabolism. Mice lacking TLR4 in the intestinal epithelium (TLR4(Delta IEC)), but not mice lacking TLR4 in myeloid cells nor mice lacking TLR4 globally, developed metabolic syndrome; these features were not observed in TLR4(Delta IEC) mice given antibiotics. Metagenomic analysis of the fecal microbiota revealed differences between TLR4(Delta IEC) and wild-type mice, while meta-transcriptome analysis of the microbiota showed that intestinal TLR4 affected the expression of microbial genes involved in the metabolism of lipids, amino acids, and nucleotides. Genes regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and the antimicrobial peptide lysozyme were significantly downregulated in TLR4(Delta IEC) mice, suggesting a mechanism by which intestinal TLR4 could exert its effects on the microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Supportingly, antibiotics prevented both downregulation of PPAR genes and the development of metabolic syndrome, while PPAR agonists prevented development of metabolic syndrome in TLR4(Delta IEC) mice. Thus, intestinal epithelial TLR4 regulates metabolic syndrome through altered host-bacterial signaling, suggesting that microbial or PPAR-based strategies might have therapeutic potential for this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available