4.0 Article

Hypovolemia explains the reduced stroke volume at altitude

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/phy2.94

Keywords

Acclimatization; blood; Frank-Starling; heart; hypoxia

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Integrative Human Physiology in Zurich, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During acute altitude exposure tachycardia increases cardiac output (Q) thus preserving systemic O-2 delivery. Within days of acclimatization, however, Q normalizes following an unexplained reduction in stroke volume (SV). To investigate whether the altitude-mediated reduction in plasma volume (PV) and hence central blood volume (CBV) is the underlying mechanism we increased/decreased CBV by means of passive whole body head-down (HDT) and head-up (HUT) tilting in seven lowlanders at sea level (SL) and after 25/26 days of residence at 3454 m. Prior to the experiment on day 26, PV was normalized by infusions of a PV expander. Cardiovascular responses to whole body tilting were monitored by pulse contour analysis. After 25/26 days at 3454 m PV and blood volume decreased by 9 +/- 4% and 6 +/- 2%, respectively (P<0.001 for both). SV was reduced compared to SL for each HUT angle (P<0.0005). However, the expected increase in SV from HUT to HDT persisted and ended in the same plateau as at SL, albeit this was shifted 18 +/- 20 degrees toward HDT (P=0.019). PV expansion restored SV to SL during HUT and to an similar to 8% higher level during HDT (P=0.003). The parallel increase in SV from HUT to HDT at altitude and SL to a similar plateau demonstrates an unchanged dependence of SV on CBV, indicating that the reduced SV during HUT was related to an attenuated CBV for a given tilt angle. Restoration of SV by PV expansion rules out a significant contribution of other mechanisms, supporting that resting SV at altitude becomes reduced due to a hypovolemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available