4.7 Article

Origins of ultradiffuse galaxies in the Coma cluster - II. Constraints from their stellar populations

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 479, Issue 4, Pages 4891-4906

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1597

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: stellar content

Funding

  1. ARC [DP160101608]
  2. NSF [AST-1616710, AST-1616598]
  3. Research Corporation for Science Advancement
  4. AAO PhD top-up Scholarship
  5. Academy of Finland [311438]
  6. W. M. Keck Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this second paper of the series we study, with new Keck/DEIMOS spectra, the stellar populations of seven spectroscopically confirmed ultradiffuse galaxies (UDGs) in the Coma cluster. We find intermediate to old ages (similar to 7Gyr), low metallicities ([Z/H] similar to -0.7 dex) and mostly supersolar abundance patterns ([Mg/Fe] similar to 0.13 dex). These properties are similar to those of low-luminosity (dwarf) galaxies inhabiting the same area in the cluster and are mostly consistent with being the continuity of the stellar mass scaling relations of more massive galaxies. These UDGs' star formation histories imply a relatively recent infall into the Coma cluster, consistent with the theoretical predictions for a dwarf-like origin. However, considering the scatter in the resulting properties and including other UDGs in Coma, together with the results from the velocity phase-space study of the Paper I in this series, a mixed-bag of origins is needed to explain the nature of all UDGs. Our results thus reinforce a scenario in which many UDGs are field dwarfs that become quenched through their later infall onto cluster environments, whereas some UDGs could be genuine primordial galaxies that failed to develop due to an early quenching phase. The unknown proportion of dwarf-like to primordial-like UDGs leaves the enigma of the nature of UDGs still open.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available