4.7 Article

Tomographic local 2D analyses of the WISExSuperCOSMOS all-sky galaxy catalogue

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 478, Issue 3, Pages 3253-3265

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1265

Keywords

cosmology: observations; large-scale structure of the Universe; catalogues

Funding

  1. FAPERJ Brazilian funding agency
  2. CAPES Brazilian Agency [88881.064966/2014-01]
  3. FAPESP Brazilian funding agency
  4. CAPES fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent progress in obtaining larger and deeper galaxy catalogues is of fundamental importance for cosmological studies, especially to robustly measure the large-scale density fluctuations in the Universe. The present work uses the Minkowski Functionals (MF) to probe the galaxy density field from the WISExSuperCOSMOS (WSC) all-sky catalogue by performing tomographic local analyses in five redshift shells (of thickness delta z = 0.05) in the total range of 0.10 < z< 0.35. Here, for the first time, the MF are applied to 2D projections of the galaxy number count (GNC) fields with the purpose of looking for regions in the WSC catalogue with unexpected features compared to Lambda CDM mock realizations. Our methodology reveals one to three regions of the GNC maps in each redshift shell with an uncommon behaviour (extreme regions), i.e. p-value < 1.4 per cent. Indeed, the resulting MF curves show signatures that suggest the uncommon behaviour to be associated with the presence of over-or underdensities there, but contamination due to residual foregrounds is not discarded. Additionally, even though our analyses indicate a good agreement among data and simulations, we identify one highly extreme region, seemingly associated with a large clustered distribution of galaxies. Our results confirm the usefulness of the MF to analyse GNC maps from photometric galaxy data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available