4.7 Article

On the nature of hydrogen-rich superluminous supernovae

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 475, Issue 1, Pages 1046-1072

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx3179

Keywords

circumstellar matter; stars: magnetars; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual: SN2103hx; supernovae: individual: PS15br; supernovae: individual: SN2008es

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [291222]
  2. STFC [ST/I001123/1, ST/L000709/1]
  3. Royal Society-Science Foundation Ireland University Research Fellowship
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the TransRegio project [TRR33]
  5. PRIN-INAF project Transient Universe: unveiling new types of stellar explosions with PESSTO
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administrati (NASA) through the Einstein Fellowship Programme [PF6-170148]
  7. STFC through an Ernest Rutherford Fellowship
  8. EU/FP7-ERC [615929]
  9. CONICYT-Chile FONDECYT [3140534]
  10. Basal-CATA 'Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS)' of Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio del Ministerio de Economia, Fomento y Turismo [PFB-06/2007, IC120009]
  11. European Union FP7 programme through ERC [320360]
  12. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  13. University of Hawaii
  14. NASA's Planetary Defense Office [NNX14AM74G]
  15. Max Planck Society
  16. Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg
  17. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, Johns Hopkins University
  18. Durham University
  19. University of Edinburgh
  20. Queen's University Belfast
  21. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  22. Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated
  23. National Central University of Taiwan
  24. Space Telescope Science Institute
  25. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  26. National Science Foundation [AST-1238877]
  27. University of Maryland, Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE)
  28. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  29. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  30. STFC [ST/P006892/1, ST/P002218/1, ST/M003035/1, ST/L000709/1, ST/M005348/1, ST/I001123/1, ST/P000312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  31. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000709/1, ST/P006892/1, ST/I001123/1, ST/P002218/1, ST/P000312/1, ST/M003035/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present two hydrogen-rich superluminous supernovae (SLSNe): SN2103hx and PS 15br. These objects, together with SN2008es, are the only SLSNe showing a distinct, broad H alpha feature during the photospheric phase; also, they show no sign of strong interaction between fast moving ejecta and circumstellar shells in their early spectra. Despite the fact that the peak luminosity of PS 15br is fainter than that of the other two objects, the spectrophotometric evolution is similar to SN2103hx and different from any other supernova in a similar luminosity space. We group all of them as SLSNe II and hence they are distinct from the known class of SLSN IIn. Both transients show a strong, multicomponent H alpha emission after 200 d past maximum, which we interpret as an indication of the interaction of the ejecta with an asymmetric, clumpy circumstellar material. The spectra and photometric evolution of the two objects are similar to Type II supernovae, although they have much higher luminosity and evolve on slower time-scales. This is qualitatively similar to how SLSNe I compare with normal type Ic, in that the former are brighter and evolve more slowly. We apply a magnetar and an interaction semi-analytical code to fit the light curves of our two objects and SN2008es. The overall observational data set would tend to favour the magnetar, or central engine, model as the source of the peak luminosity, although the clear signature of late-time interaction indicates that interaction can play a role in the luminosity evolution of SLSNe II at some phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available