4.7 Article

Physical properties and scaling relations of molecular clouds: the effect of stellar feedback

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 479, Issue 3, Pages 3167-3180

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1595

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. University of Surrey
  2. Swedish Research Council [20145791]
  3. European Research Council [ERC-StG-335936]
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. STFC [ST/N002717/1, ST/K00106X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using hydrodynamical simulations of entire galactic discs similar to the Milky Way (MW), reaching 4.6 pc resolution, we study the origins of observed physical properties of giant molecular clouds (GMCs). We find that efficient stellar feedback is a necessary ingredient in order to develop a realistic interstellar medium, leading to molecular cloud masses, sizes, velocity dispersions, and virial parameters in excellent agreement with MW observations. GMC scaling relations observed in the MW, such as the mass-size (M-R), velocity dispersion-size (sigma-R), and the sigma-R Sigma relations, are reproduced in a feedback-driven ISM when observed in projection, with M proportional to R-2.3 and sigma proportional to R-0.56. When analysed in 3D, GMC scaling relations steepen significantly, indicating potential limitations of our understanding of molecular cloud 3D structure from observations. Furthermore, we demonstrate how a GMC population's underlying distribution of virial parameters can strongly influence the scatter in derived scaling relations. Finally, we show that GMCs with nearly identical global properties exist in different evolutionary stages, where a majority of clouds being either gravitationally bound or expanding, but with a significant fraction being compressed by external ISM pressure, at all times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available