4.7 Article

The Cardassian expansion revisited: constraints from updated Hubble parameter measurements and type Ia supernova data

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 476, Issue 1, Pages 1036-1049

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty260

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. CONICYT/FONDECYT [3160674]
  2. Consejo Zacatecano de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (COZCYT)
  3. Centro de Astrofisica de Valparaiso (CAV)
  4. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) collaboration
  5. Instituto Avanzado de Cosmologia (IAC) collaboration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by an updated compilation of observational Hubble data (OHD) that consist of 51 points in the redshift range of 0.07 < z < 2.36, we study an interesting model known as Cardassian that drives the late cosmic acceleration without a dark energy component. Our compilation contains 31 data points measured with the differential age method by Jimenez & Loeb (2002), and 20 data points obtained from clustering of galaxies. We focus on two modified Friedmann equations: the original Cardassian (OC) expansion and the modified polytropic Cardassian (MPC). The dimensionless Hubble, E(z), and the deceleration parameter, q(z), are revisited in order to constrain the OC and MPC free parameters, first with the OHD and then contrasted with recent observations of type Ia supernova (SN Ia) using the compressed and full joint-light-analysis (JLA) samples (Betoule et al.). We also perform a joint analysis using the combination OHD plus compressed JLA. Our results show that the OC and MPC models are in agreement with the standard cosmology and naturally introduce a cosmological-constant-like extra term in the canonical Friedmann equation with the capability of accelerating the Universe without dark energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available