4.7 Article

Extracting cosmological information from the angular power spectrum of the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 476, Issue 1, Pages 1050-1070

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty262

Keywords

galaxies: photometry; cosmological parameters; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the Severo Ochoa program [SEV-2015-0548]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO [614.001.451]
  3. Polish National Science Center [UMO2012/07/D/ST9/02785]
  4. MUIR PRIN
  5. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana [ASI/INAF/I/023/12/0]
  6. Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation
  7. Directorate General for the Country Promotion [ZA14GR02]
  8. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the almost all-sky 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue (2MPZ) we perform for the first time a tomographic analysis of galaxy angular clustering in the local Universe (z < 0.24). We estimate the angular auto-and cross-power spectra of 2MPZ galaxies in three photometric redshift bins, and use dedicated mock catalogues to assess their errors. We measure a subset of cosmological parameters, having fixed the others at their Planck values, namely the baryon fraction f(b) = 0.14(-0.06)(+0.09), the total matter density parameter Omega(m) = 0.30 +/- 0.06, and the effective linear bias of 2MPZ galaxies b(eff), which grows from 1.1(-0.4)(+0.3) at < z > = 0.05 up to 2.1(-0.5)(+0.3) at < z > = 0.2, largely because of the flux-limited nature of the data set. The results obtained here for the local Universe agree with those derived with the same methodology at higher redshifts, and confirm the importance of the tomographic technique for next-generation photometric surveys such as Euclid or Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available