4.7 Article

The maximum flux of star-forming galaxies

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty989

Keywords

hydrodynamics; instabilities; radiative transfer; jets and outflows; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star clusters

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects grant [DP160100695]
  2. National Science Foundation [1516967]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA 17-ATP17-0177]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1516967] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of radiation pressure feedback in galaxy formation has been extensively debated over the last decade. The regime of greatest uncertainty is in the most actively starforming galaxies, where large dust columns can potentially produce a dust-reprocessed infrared radiation field with enough pressure to drive turbulence or eject material. Here, we derive the conditions under which a self-gravitating mixed gas-star disc can remain hydrostatic despite trapped radiation pressure. Consistently, taking into account the self-gravity of the medium, the star- and dust-to-gas ratios, and the effects of turbulent motions not driven by radiation, we show that galaxies can achieve a maximum Eddington-limited star formation rate per unit area Sigma(*,crit) similar to 10(3)M(circle dot) pc(-2) Myr(-1), corresponding to a critical flux of F-*,F-crit 10(13) L-circle dot kpc(-2) similar to previous estimates; higher fluxes eject mass in bulk, halting further star formation. Conversely, we show that in galaxies below this limit, our 1D models imply simple vertical hydrostatic equilibrium and that radiation pressure is ineffective at driving turbulence or ejecting matter. Because the vast majority of star-forming galaxies lie below the maximum limit for typical dust-to-gas ratios, we conclude that infrared radiation pressure is likely unimportant for all but the most extreme systems on galaxy-wide scales. Thus, while radiation pressure does not explain the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, it does impose an upper truncation on it. Our predicted truncation is in good agreement with the highest observed gas and star formation rate surface densities found both locally and at high redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available