4.7 Article

Twin radio relics in the nearby low-mass galaxy cluster Abell 168

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 477, Issue 1, Pages 957-963

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty744

Keywords

radiation mechanisms: non-thermal; techniques: interferometric; galaxies: clusters: individual: A168; galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; radio continuum: general; X-rays: galaxies: clusters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the discovery of twin radio relics in the outskirts of the low-mass merging galaxy cluster Abell 168 (redshift=0.045). One of the relics is elongated with a linear extent similar to 800 kpc and projected width of similar to 80 kpc and is located similar to 900 kpc towards the north of the cluster centre, oriented roughly perpendicular to the major axis of the X-ray emission. The second relic is ring-shaped with a size similar to 220 kpc and is located near the inner edge of the elongated relic at a distance of similar to 600 kpc from the cluster centre. These radio sources were imaged at 323 and 608 MHz with the Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope and at 1520 MHz with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA). The elongated relic was detected at all frequencies, with a radio power of 1.38+0.14x10(23) WHz(-1) at 1.4 GHz and a power law in the frequency range 70-1500 MHz (S alpha nu(alpha), alpha=-1.1+0.04). This radio power is in good agreement with that expected from the known empirical relation between the radio powers of relics and host cluster masses. This is the lowest mass (M-500=1.24x10(14) M-circle dot) cluster in which relics due to merger shocks are detected. The ring-shaped relic has a steeper spectral index (alpha) of 1.74 +/- 0.29 in the frequency range 100-600 MHz. We propose this relic to be an old plasma, revived due to adiabatic compression by the outgoing shock that produced the elongated relic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available