4.7 Article

Too hot to handle? Analytic solutions for massive neutrino or warm dark matter cosmologies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 478, Issue 1, Pages 516-529

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1081

Keywords

neutrinos; dark matter; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: theory

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship Award by the Chandra X-ray Observatory Center [PF7-180167]
  2. National Aeronautics Space Administration [NAS8-03060]
  3. Chamberlain Fellowship at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  4. Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We obtain novel closed-form solutions to the Friedmann equation for cosmological models containing a component whose equation of state is that of radiation (w = 1/3) at early times and that of cold pressureless matter (w = 0) at late times. The equation of state smoothly transitions from the early- to late-time behaviour and exactly describes the evolution of a species with a Dirac delta function distribution in momentum magnitudes vertical bar p(0)vertical bar (i.e. all particles have the same vertical bar p(0)vertical bar). Such a component, here termed 'hot matter', is an approximate model for both neutrinos and warm dark matter. We consider it alone and in combination with cold matter and with radiation, also obtaining closed-form solutions for the growth of superhorizon perturbations in each case. The idealized model recovers t(a) to better than 1.5 per cent accuracy for all a relative to a Fermi-Dirac distribution (as describes neutrinos). We conclude by adding the second moment of the distribution to our exact solution and then generalizing to include all moments of an arbitrary momentum distribution in a closed-form solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available