4.8 Article

Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1040-1052

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41380-018-0028-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health (IRP-NIMH-NIH) [NCT00088699/04-M-0222/ZIA MH002857]
  2. NARSAD Independent Investigator Award
  3. Brain and Behavior Mood Disorders Research Award
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [ZIAMH002857] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ketamine's mechanism of action was assessed using gamma power from magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a proxy measure for homeostatic balance in 35 unmedicated subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 25 healthy controls enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over trial of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine. MDD subjects showed significant improvements in depressive symptoms, and healthy control subjects exhibited modest but significant increases in depressive symptoms for up to 1 day after ketamine administration. Both groups showed increased resting gamma power following ketamine. In MDD subjects, gamma power was not associated with the magnitude of the antidepressant effect. However, baseline gamma power was found to moderate the relationship between post-ketamine gamma power and antidepressant response; specifically, higher post-ketamine gamma power was associated with better response in MDD subjects with lower baseline gamma, with an inverted relationship in MDD subjects with higher baseline gamma. This relationship was observed in multiple regions involved in networks hypothesized to be involved in the pathophysiology of MDD. This finding suggests biological subtypes based on the direction of homeostatic dysregulation and has important implications for inferring ketamine's mechanism of action from studies of healthy controls alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available