4.5 Article

Cannabidiol Inhibits Endocannabinoid Signaling in Autaptic Hippocampal Neurons

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 743-748

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.118.111864

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EY24625, EY24717, DA009158, DA021696]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are two main cannabinoid constituents of marijuana and hashish. The pharmacology of Delta(9)-THC has been extensively studied, whereas our understanding of the pharmacology of CBD has remained limited, despite excitement in CBD's potential role in treating certain pediatric epilepsies and its reputation for attenuating some Delta(9)-THC-induced effects. It was established early on that CBD binds poorly to the orthosteric site of CB1 or CB2 cannabinoid receptors, and its actions were commonly attributed to other noncannabinoid receptor mechanisms. However, recent evidence suggests that CBD does indeed act at cannabinoid CB1 receptors as a negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of CB1 signaling. By altering the orthosteric signaling of a G protein-coupled receptor, allosteric modulators greatly increase the richness of G proteincoupled receptor pharmacology. We have recently surveyed candidate CB1 NAMs in autaptic hippocampal neurons, a wellcharacterized neuronal model of endogenous cannabinoid signaling, and have now tested CBD in this model. We find that although CBD has no direct effect on excitatory transmission, it does inhibit two forms of endogenous cannabinoid-mediated retrograde synaptic plasticity: depolarization-induced suppression of excitation and metabotropic suppression of excitation, while not affecting signaling via GABA-B receptors. These results are consistent with the recently described NAM activity of CBD and suggest interesting possible mechanisms for CBD's therapeutic actions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available