4.4 Article

Transcriptomic Hepatotoxicity Signature of Chlorpromazine after Short- and Long-Term Exposure in Primary Human Sandwich Cultures

Journal

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
Volume 41, Issue 10, Pages 1835-1842

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.052415

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FP7 (European Commission Seventh Framework Programme) Health Predict-IV Profiling the toxicity of new drugs: A nonanimal-based approach integrating toxicodynamics and biokinetics [202222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug-induced liver injury is the most frequent reason for market withdrawal of approved drugs, and is difficult to predict in animal models. Here, we analyzed transcriptomic data derived from short- and long-term cultured primary human hepatocytes (PHH) exposed to the well known human hepatotoxin chlorpromazine (CPZ). Samples were collected from five PHH cultures after short-term (1 and 3 days) and long-term (14 days) repeat daily treatment with 0.1 or 0.2 mu M CPZ, corresponding to C-max. Two PHH cultures were additionally treated with 1 mu M CPZ, and the three others with 0.02 mM CPZ. Differences in the total number of gene changes were seen between donors and throughout treatment. Specific transcriptomic hepatotoxicity signatures were created for CPZ and consisted of inflammation/hepatitis, cholestasis, and liver proliferation in all five donors, as well as fibrosis and steatosis, which were observed in four of five donors. Necrosis was present in three of five donors, and an indicative signature of cirrhosis was observed after long-term 14-day repeat treatment, also in three of five donors. The inter-donor variability in the inflammatory response to CPZ treatment was associated with variability in the strength of the response of the transcriptomic hepatotoxicity signatures, suggesting that features of inflammation could be related to the idiosyncratic hepatotoxic effects of CPZ in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available